Saturday, June 25, 2016

365 Days of MoviePass Review, Year 3, Movie #354: "Independence Day: Resurgence" (2016)

Movie"Independence Day: Resurgence"
Ticket Price: $12.50
Director: Roland Emmerich
Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 2 hours, 1 minute
Image Source
Earth has spent the last 20 years rebuilding and preparing for the possible return of their alien attackers. They have integrated the alien technology with Earth technologies to create a massive space defense system and military. Despite all of these advancements, they could have never expected the level of retaliation brought on by their intergalactic adversaries.

Twenty years ago, Roland Emmerich brought the science fiction epic "Independence Day" to theaters, and with massive success. Now, he has returned to the directors seat for "Independence Day: Resurgence." If you're wondering why there is another installment in this franchise, just check its box office numbers to see the proof. It's also no surprise it came out this year, considering this is the year of the long-awaited sequel. Boasting impressive eye-candy, the effects in "Resurgence" somehow don't feel as timeless as the ones from the original which, once again, are 20 years old, but are still flashy and fun to look at. These effects are well executed, but considering its $200 million price tag, they better have some damn good graphics. The aliens, the ships, and the CGI sets all look very good. The action sequences are also great. While we do appreciate that the visuals are entertaining and striking to look at, bombarding the screen with effects on top of effects on top of effects is the quickest way to make your movie become boring, tiresome, and busy, which is what winds up happening here. The entire thing is computer generated apart from a few sets and minor practical pieces.

Many actors from the original cast return to reprise their roles, including Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman, Judd Hirsch, Vivica A. Fox, and Brent Spiner. New to the cast are: Maika Monroe, who takes over the role of Patricia Whitmore, the former president's daughter; Liam Hemsworth, who plays Patricia's fiance and rebellious pilot Jake Morrison; Jessie T. Usher, who plays Dylan Hiller, the son of Will Smith's character from the original; William Fitchner, who plays General Adams, and many, many others. When it comes to big disaster-style epics like this, an ensemble cast is to be expected. Here, this has come at a cost. Having so many characters, Emmerich and his writers have sacrificed any and almost all real character development, especially when it comes to the younger cast members. When you don't care about the characters in a movie, it makes it hard to get invested in their plight or feel for the emotions they are trying to portray. Part of this could be because most of these younger actors lack the ability to emote properly. Liam Hemsworth (unsurprisingly) and Jessie T. Usher are as stiff as a board. These two actors sound completely unnatural in their performances. Maika Monroe may have been good in both "The Guest" and "It Follows," but she has been borderline terrible in everything since these two films. Jeff Goldblum and Judd Hirsch are this sequel's only saving graces, getting in a lot of personality and jokes throughout the course of this mess. Many other characters are also shoehorned in and don't feel like they belong, including Joey King's Sam, Nicolas Wright's Floyd, and Ryan Cartwright's Ryan.

Finally, one thing that is abundantly clear to us is that "Independence Day: Resurgence" doubles down on the idea of an alien invasion. It's as if the only two requirements for this sequel were to: A) be bigger than the original, and B) have higher stakes than the original. When the stakes of the original were to have all life on Earth destroyed, it's hard to try and up the ante. So now, not only Earth is at stake, but the entire universe is at risk as well, with a conveniently added ticking time clock counting down to annihilation. Because of this, the plot comes off as downright stupid, super contrived, and also extremely inconsistent with its predecessor, not that there was much there to begin with. In addition, the plot is fleshed out with "Transformers" levels of full-fledged pandering, which makes sense considering many other thematic happenings reminded us of a third-rate Michael Bay-directed "Armageddon." Tons of unnecessary elements are added to appeal to Chinese and Asian audiences. China is the second biggest film market in the world, so pandering to them is pretty much the norm for big action movies now. We understand it, but when it's as blatantly obvious as it is in this film, it's just tacky.

"Independence Day: Resurgence" might be worth your hard earned money for the visual spectacle alone, but just know this movie is nowhere near entertaining in any other manner of speaking. It drags, it sacrifices character development in exchange for pizzazz in the form of battles scenes, and suffers from a lack of engagement, a lack of interest, and a lack of talent. It's all flash and no substance. We say pass until it comes out on home video.

My Rating: 3.5/10
BigJ's Rating: 4.5/10
IMDB's Rating: 5.9/10
Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 33%
Do we recommend this movie: No.
One year ago, we were watching: "Shadow of the Vampire"

Friday, June 24, 2016

Netflix Movie Review: "Always" (1989)

Image Source
Director: Steven Spielberg
Year: 1989
Rating: PG
Running Time: 2 hours, 2 minutes

After a fire fighting pilot named Pete (Richard Dreyfuss) dies in the line of duty, he returns to Earth as an invisible guardian angel. He is meant to guide a young pilot named Ted (Brad Johnson) through his troubles, but when this young pilot falls for Pete's old girlfriend Dorinda (Holly Hunter), Pete has to make a choice: he can either do what's best for him, or do what's best for Dorinda and Ted.

Directed by Steve Spielberg, "Always" is a modernized remake of the film "A Guy Named Joe." It stars Richard Dreyfuss as Pete, a daredevil fire fighting pilot who often takes unnecessary risks to get the job done. He works with his best friend Al, played by one of our favorites John Goodman, and his girlfriend Dorinda, played by Holly Hunter. After agreeing to stop taking risks and to finally settle down with Dorinda, Pete goes out for one more mission, where he dies saving Al's life. Though it sounds a little cliche, this entire scene is extremely effective in the manner in which it is handled. It's an impactful, necessary, tasteful scene, even though someone is perishing. Now, a dead Pete has become a guardian angel and is meant to guide a young, up-and-coming pilot named Ted, played by Brad Johnson, through his training and his life. In turn, Ted is guided by Hap, played by Audrey Hepburn in her final on-screen appearance. The entire thing becomes this existential love triangle when Ted falls for Dorinda, who is still in the process getting over the loss of Pete, but also starts to have feelings for Ted, too. Pete must come to a decision about whether or not he can set aside his own feelings and let Dorinda move on with her life.

"Always" is a different type of romance to say the least, though it could be compared to something like "Ghost" in terms of plot. This is a film about moving on with your life after a loved one dies, something that can and will be very difficult for some. This is a movie made by one of the greatest modern day directors, Steven Spielberg, and boasts an excellent cast featuring Dreyfuss, Hunter, Goodman, and even Audrey Hepburn, all of whom act the hell out of their parts. Some might see this as an odd choice for Spielberg. Unfortunately, not a lot of his signature directorial style can be found here. We can't help but feel this film is missing something. There is a certain amount of emotional depth lacking within its story, even for such an emotionally charged subject matter. It more of a ghost tale than an honest love story, and a sappy one at that. Maybe it's because we never fully bought in to the relationship between Dorinda and Ted. If we're being honest, we think Dorinda seemed to have much better chemistry with both Al and Pete than she did with Ted. For some reason, Ted, who is portrayed as a handsome heartthrob, seems better suited with the bumbling mechanic Rachel, played by Marg Helgenberger, than with Dorinda.

All this being said, "Always" does have an impressive cast and is still very watchable despite the lack of a connection between characters later on in the movie. There are a few light, humorous moments despite being billed as a drama, though when the drama comes, it comes in droves and is filled to the brim with sap and cheese. We would consider this one of Spielberg's most forgettable films and nothing that happens within its 122 minute run time is all that memorable long term.

My Rating: 6.5/10
BigJ's Rating: 6/10
IMDB's Rating: 6.4/10
Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 64%
Do we recommend this movie: Sure, why not?
One year ago, we were watching: "Inventing the Abbotts"

365 Days of MoviePass Review, Year 3, Movie #353: "Maggie's Plan" (2016)

Movie"Maggie's Plan"
Ticket Price: $9.75
Director: Rebecca Miller
Rating: R
Running Time: 1 hour, 38 minutes
Image Source
Maggie thinks she has it all planned out. She has recently decided to become a mother through artificial insemination. Just as she puts this plan into action, she suddenly falls in love with a married writer named John (Ethan Hawke), breaking up his already strained marriage with university professor Georgette (Julianne Moore). Now after nearly three years of marriage, Maggie is starting to find that John is not the guy for her, and from there, hatches a new plan to reunite him with his ex-wife.

Written for the screen and directed by Rebecca Miller, "Maggie's Plan" is a quirky romantic dramedy starring indie hipster darling Greta Gerwig. Gerwig plays the titular Maggie, and as one might expect, she has many plans that she uses as a means to control her life. Her first plan is to have a child through artificial insemination. She wants the father of her child to be a guy named Guy, played by Travis Fimmel, who despite being college educated, chooses to make and sell pickles. This plan gets slightly derailed when Maggie falls in love with a married writer named John, played by Ethan Hawke. He is married to a tenured university professor named Georgette, played by Julianne Moore, who is one of the top professors in her field and is made out to be a bit of a witch by John. Of course, Maggie and John's affair destroys what little bit was left of his crumbling marriage, but the pair quickly turns around and marries each other. Now three years later, not only does Maggie have to take care of her own daughter (almost entirely by herself), but she's often left in a position by her husband where she has to care for her two stepchildren as well. She's also taking care of John as he is still trying to finish his book, in between long phone conversations with his ex-wife, of course. Maggie is starting to think she's made a big mistake. Now, after some innocent seeming words from her friend Felicia, Maggie hatches a new plan to get rid of John by trying to convince Georgette to take him back.

As you can see, "Maggie's Plan" is not your typical romantic comedy or drama. In fact, the entire thing is very much an anti-romantic comedy. Like many romances in movies, it all starts with an affair. However, unlike most movies, this one doesn't jump to the happily ever after. This one moves straight from Maggie and John's very first kiss and subsequent sexual encounter to the "hahaha, now you're the one who is married and miserable" plot line. It might sound bad for two people who are rather happily married to give a movie like this a good rating, but we so appreciate what it tries to do and say about love and romance by showcasing the messiness of it all instead of the princess fairytale bullshit we are fed in pop culture.

"Maggie's Plan" boasts an outstanding cast, containing many actors who are involved in both smaller, low budget films as well as big Hollywood productions. Greta Gerwig is no stranger to the intellectual, impassioned role. She plays the part of Maggie as well as she's played any other part, only this time around, we actually tolerated her and rather loved her performance. Hawke is always excellent, even when he plays the sleazy smart guy who is simultaneously charming but horrible. Fimmel as Guy is simply adorable, a goofy acting academic who stopped doing math to focus on being a pickle entrepreneur. He's worlds better here than he was in "Warcraft." Finally, Julianne Moore is in a class all her own. Her character Georgette is intimidating, scholarly, slightly cold, but also very warm and surprisingly forgiving and receptive to "the other woman" in Maggie. Her accent puzzled us momentarily, but she pulls it off with flying colors. Together, all of these characters interact with one another in this screwball indie romcom. Along with the aforementioned Gerwig, Hawke, Fimmell, and Moore, this movie also stars Bill Hader as Tony, and Maya Rudolph as his wife Felicia, who are Maggie's best friends. These actors play very well off each other and help breath life into this awkward style of comedy, though we expect no less from two seasoned Saturday Night Live veterans and resident indie movie actors themselves.

There is a lot of precision-point, extremely funny dialogue that goes on within the script, which is insightful, smart, and witty. It shows that even college educated people with advanced degrees can still make stupid decisions when it comes to life and love. As we mentioned, we appreciate this different point of view about modern love and relationships, but this is not the kind of movie for wide-eyed, idealistic lovers of love. "Maggie's Plan" will satisfy fans of Gerwig and her niche type of films, as well as romance cynics who just want to watch it all burn in a blaze of glory. We think the chemistry between everyone involved is pretty great, and we also like the direction by Rebecca Miller. All in all, we think this film is definitely worth watching if you appreciate different takes on all too familiar subjects.

My Rating: 8.5/10
BigJ's Rating: 8/10
IMDB's Rating: 6.6/10
Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 85%
Do we recommend this movie: Yes!
One year ago, we were watching: "The Impossible"

Thursday, June 23, 2016

Movie Review: "The Adventures of Tintin" (2011)

Image Source
Movie"The Adventures of Tintin"
Director: Steven Spielberg
Year: 2011
Rating: PG
Running Time: 1 hour, 47 minutes

At a flea market, a journalist named Tintin (Jamie Bell) buys a model ship of a vessel known as the Unicorn. He becomes the target of a dangerous man named Sakharine (Daniel Craig), who wants the ship for himself. Little does Tintin know, the ship contains a clue to the location of a sunken fortune, which is about to send him on an unexpected adventure across the globe.

"The Adventures of Tintin" is directed by Steven Spielberg and is based on the comic book series of the same name. It is the first and only animated feature to date directed by Spielberg. It revolves around a journalist named Tintin, voiced by Jamie Bell, who unwittingly gets entangled in a dangerous adventure when he buys a model ship at a flea market. Tintin is just a ship enthusiast, but what he doesn't know is that his latest purchase contains a clue that could lead to a long lost sunken treasure. A rather sinister man named Sakharine, voiced by Daniel Craig, is after the treasure and will stop at nothing to get it, even if it means killing those who get in his way. Tintin eventually joins forces with a drunken sea captain named Haddock, voiced Andy Serkis, who is also a descendant of the man who sunk the treasure to begin with. Haddock and Tintin have their work cut out for them and must get to the treasure before Sakharine does, so long as Haddock can stay off the sauce long enough to remember where they are going.

Even though this is an animated film, it doesn't have the same tone or look you typically get from almost any other animated movie. "The Adventures of Tintin" plays out much like any live action adventure film would. We also can't help but notice how similar this movie is to something like Spielberg's "Indiana Jones" movies, even though we know this film takes after the book series, which I grew up reading as a kid. The style of animation has a very realistic look to it, and though it does look pretty cool, the film as whole absolutely doesn't need to be animated. In other comparable animated films, characters like the ones showcased here wind up looking dead eyed and soulless. Luckily, Spielberg is able to breathe a certain level of life into these CGI characters, and luckily so because a lot of what we hoped this movie could have been gets lost in translation. Often in animated films, body proportions and the angles of faces are played with to make characters look more innocent or evil depending on what the characters call for. However, all of the characters here are made to look as human as possible, which begs the question: why not simply make this a live action film and save the money? It's not like animated ventures are any cheaper, and with a reported $135 million dollar price tag, a fairly large scale live action production could have been easily accomplished. With a little digging, we found out that a live action film was Spielberg's original intent, but he was ultimately convinced by Peter Jackson that a motion-capture animated feature would do better justice to the characters and aesthetic found in the comics. We aren't sure we totally agree. We feel as if this could have been just as good if not better as a live action adventure.

"The Adventures of Tintin" is not a bad movie by any stretch of the imagination, but it definitely has its faults. It's a pretty solid adventure with a decent story and some good moments of perilous action, but it's still missing some fantastic spark that'd make Tintin pop off the pages of his comics and onto the silver screen. It feels overlong and can get absentminded. Snowy is very underutilized, and we wish he and Tintin both had more defining characteristics to set them apart from any of the other protagonists from Spielberg's repertoire. It's also a bit too silly to me. This is not a complete divergence from the comic book series, but it's obvious that this silliness is implemented in an effort to keep little kids interested, but we're not sure they will be due to its more mature themes and the time it takes to get to its conclusion. You might like this film, but you also might not.

My Rating: 6/10
BigJ's Rating: 7/10
IMDB's Rating: 7.4/10
Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 75%
Do we recommend this movie: Sure, why not?

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Monthly Savings Roundup: Month #35 with MoviePass (May 23rd, 2016 - June 22nd, 2016)

-Monthly Charge: $29.99/month x 2 = $59.98 for 2 memberships of MoviePass

-Yearly Charge: $359.88 per person, per year ($719.76 for 2 people to have a 1 year subscription to MoviePass)

-Total Movies Seen This Month: 16 (5 of which we would have seen if we didn't have MoviePass)

Face Value of Ticket Prices: $9.75 (The Nice Guys) +  $9.75 (The Darkness) + $12.50 (X-Men: Apocalypse) +  $12.50 (Alice Through the Looking Glass) +  $9.75 (The Meddler)  $9.75 (A Bigger Splash) + $12.50 (Me Before You) +  $12.50 (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2: Out of the Shadows) + $12.50 (Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping) +  $12.50 (Love & Friendship) +  $12.50 (The Conjuring 2)  $9.75 (Warcraft) +$9.75 (The Lobster) +  $12.50 (Central Intelligence) + $12.50 (Finding Dory) + $9.75 (Maggie's Plan)  = $180.75 x 2 = $361.50

-Total Monthly Savings With MoviePass$301.52

-Total Yearly Savings With MoviePass$1,556.50 (we HAVE exceeded our annual cost of MoviePass)

*July - August savings: $0
*August - September savings: $0
*September - October savings : $0
*October - November savings: $107.40
*November - December savings: $91.02
*December - January savings: $227.02
*January - February savings: $203.52
*February - March savings: $253.52
*March - April savings: $213.50
*April - May savings: $159.00
*May - June savings: $301.52
*June - July savings: $

Movie Review: "Independence Day" (1996)

Add caption
Movie"Independence Day"
Director: Roland Emmerich
Year: 1996
Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 2 hours, 25 minutes

Aliens invade Earth and destroy some of the biggest cities around the globe. With all odds against them, the human race must join together on the Fourth of July and fight back against this extraterrestrial scourge.

"Independence Day" is the science fiction action epic directed by Roland Emmerich and perhaps one of the biggest, baddest popcorn flicks ever made. He was fresh off of making the sci-fi adventure film "Stargate," so he was really no stranger to large scale, special effects driven films. Unlike "Stargate," however, which has become a mere footnote in Emmerich's career, "ID4," as it has come to be known in common parlance, made a much bigger impact both socially and monetarily, and it is also slightly better rated, too.

This movie boasts a large, impressive cast of characters played by the likes of Will Smith, Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman, Randy Quaid (big for the time, we guess?), Judd Hirsch, Vivica A. Fox, James Rebhorn, Mary McDonnell, and Margaret Colin, just to name a few. The plot couldn't be more simple. Aliens come to earth, they blow a bunch of shit up, and the aforementioned actors have to find a way to fight back against their advanced alien technologies. Sure, there is an added human element and a lot of focus on the relationships between the human characters, which is where most the story comes from, but all of this plot only serves to fill the void in between the massive action sequences. Each of these characters are developed enough to where it makes us care about them only slightly. We get a rough sketch of each of their personalities and what their lives are like, as well as their past engagements with other characters within the story.

Speaking of the story, we have to say, it's very flimsy and has plenty of holes which can be easily picked apart if someone wanted to do so, but an enthralling story is not why $817.4 million dollars worth of people watch this type of movie. This is all about epic action scenes, humongous battles with aliens, and motivating speeches given by an inspirational type of hero character on the fourth of July in good ol' 'Murica, and damn it, it's fun as hell. "Independence Day" has these types of plot devices down, and Bill Pullman's rousing "today we celebrate our Independence Day!" speech as President Thomas J. Whitmore is still one of the best speeches in cinematic history. The fact that this line might be ad-libbed makes it all the more incredible. These are the things this film has down to a science. In addition, the special effects are fantastic. Despite going on 20 years old, the effects still look nearly as good as most anything you'd see today. They have held up very well and rarely look cheesy or dated, maybe apart from one or two scenes. The makeup work on the aliens themselves is also well executed. They look amazingly realistic as slimy, practically constructed creatures, something we fear we will not see in the sequel, "Independence Day: Resurgence," which we cannot say we're looking forward to come this June 24th, 2016.

"Independence Day" doesn't masquerade itself as something deeper than it is. It never pretends to be anything other than a mindless, fun, spectacle and action-filled summer popcorn flick that you can kick back and enjoy at at least some level as long as you don't analyze it too much. It's worth it for Pullman's speech and the fantastic visuals alone.

My Rating: 6/10
BigJ's Rating: 6.5/10
IMDB's Rating: 6.9/10
Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 61%
Do we recommend this movie: Sure, why not?
One year ago, we were watching: "Jurassic Park III"

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

365 Days of MoviePass Review, Year 3, Movie #352: "Finding Dory" (2016)

Movie"Finding Dory"
Ticket Price: $12.50
Director: Andrew Stanton and Angus MacLane
Rating: PG
Running Time: 1 hour, 37 minutes
Image Source
Dory (Ellen DeGeneres) has been living with Nemo (Hayden Rolence) and Marlin (Albert Brooks) ever since she helped Marlin find Nemo a year prior. One night, Dory is struck with a memory of her parents, as well as the location of her old home. Now, longing to find the family she lost many years ago, Dory, Marlin, and Nemo set out on a quest to find her home and her parents...if only she could remember where she's going.

Just keep swimming!

"Finding Dory" is the long awaited sequel to the 2003 smash hit Pixar film "Finding Nemo." Ellen DeGeneres, who voices the titular Dory, has been campaigning for a sequel to "Nemo" featuring Dory for years, and it has now finally come to fruition. "Finding Nemo" is a tall order to live up to as it is one of our favorite Pixar movies, as we're sure is the case for many other fans and critics alike. We were almost worried about the sequel and wondered what it might do, if anything, to win over the hearts and minds of the people after such a grand slam like "Nemo." With realistic, tepid expectations, we were worried it would be a disappointment, but we're glad to say this is not the case in the slightest.

Let's get this out of the way: "Finding Dory" is not as good as its predecessor, but it sure is close! Ellen DeGeneres, once again, is fantastic as Dory. Her radiant, happy charm shines through our favorite animated blue tang brilliantly. We thought we might get tired of Dory as the protagonist because of her constant forgetting due to her short-term memory loss, but we never did. In fact, because of her forgetful nature, the underlying point can also made that the film wants the audience to think about those we love who are going through a disability like Dory's. The connection is too powerful to deny, and we really appreciate what the film tries to say here. We are happy Ellen championed as hard as she did for this film because she does a tremendous job. Joining her are many other spectacular actors who lend their vocal talents to this movie. Albert Brooks, who reprises his role as Marlin, once again does a great job as the worry-wart, always-playing-it-safe father of Nemo. New to the cast are the fabulous Ed O'Neill, who voices a seven-legged octopus named Hank, who joins forces with Dory in her quest to find her parents, Kaitlin Olson as Destiny the Whale Shark, and Ty Burrell as Bailey the Beluga. These animals are all part of the Marine Life Institute, which is where Marlin, Nemo, and Dory end up while trying to find her parents before getting split apart. These character are absolutely splendid. Ed O'Neill adds quite an interesting flair as Hank, who frequently camouflages and wants out of the conservatory at all costs, and Dory is just the ticket to his freedom. He's also a bit salty, not exactly friendly and seems to have a chip on his (many) shoulders. Destiny and Bailey are both in enclosures at the institute, and we learn that Dory might already know at least one of them from when she was a baby. These two characters are really funny and super entertaining. These new friends want to aid Dory in her quest to find her parents, but without Marlin and Nemo to help her remember, she sometimes has a difficult time.

After being split apart, Marlin and Nemo, now voiced by Hayden Rolence, happen upon a pair of sea lions named Fluke and Rudder, voiced by Idris Elba and Dominic West, who laze about on a rock near the Institute. These two supporting characters are amazing, two more welcome, wonderful additions to the cast. Their dynamic with each other and with Marlin and Nemo are great, but there is also a third sea lion named Gerald, who also gets many laughs and ultimately triumphs over his rock-hoarding friends. This time around, it's not just Dory who gets all the glory. Each of these individual characters gets their shining moment to make the audience smile, laugh, or maybe shed a tear, though unlike "Finding Nemo," we personally got teary-eyed during this sequel.

There is an undeniable, endearing quality to this film. We are drawn to the characters new and old, and even in our 30's are enthralled by the story, despite its simplicity and the fact there is no real antagonist. Dory and her companions are faced with a series of obstacles to overcome, but there is no villain to face, which is a nice change of pace from most movies made for kids. The only downfall we found in "Finding Dory" is that it isn't quite as emotionally gripping as the other films in Pixar's repertoire. It is also very similar to its predecessor in terms of plot, following nearly the same formula to the point where it does become a little bit predictable. Ultimately, though, you can't go wrong with "Finding Dory." We really, really, really, really, really, really like this sequel and we're soooo close to loving it, but we don't absolutely love it like we did with "Finding Nemo." Even though this is the case, it is still a wonderful movie filled with excellent voice over work, brilliant and hilarious new characters, crisp and ever-evolving animation, bright, flashy colors, and a fun, adventurous spirit. Kids will love it for the newness it brings to the franchise, and adults will love the nostalgia factor.

My Rating: 8.5/10
BigJ's Rating: 8.5/10
IMDB's Rating: 8.2/10
Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 94%
Do we recommend this movie: Yes!
One year ago, we were watching: "The Terminator"